Thursday, February 19, 2015

No Spoilers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_UxLEqd074



Paranormal Activity was advertising genius. I hate movie theaters and everything they did to sell it made me go watch it opening night. The first commercials weren’t as long as this one. They began about 30 seconds long with a note at the end asking customers to vote online. If a state had enough votes, the movie would be shown at their local theaters. Later on they began showing commercials like this one, containing scenes from the movie and the reactions of those watching it. After so many terrible horror movies, this seemed very refreshing. We were confused, intrigued, and definitely curious. The commercials didn’t tell us anything about the plot but it didn’t matter because the point was that it was scary.

They used a trick that’s seen a lot in retail: exclusivity. By claiming a product to be unavailable to the majority, they convinced the customers into thinking that it’s more valuable than it actually is. Showing the movie in only a select number of theaters made customers want it (or “demand it”) more, like the common saying goes: you want what you can’t have. Why did we need this in our theaters? It was just a horror movie but it claimed to be different from the rest. The clips of people’s reactions during the trailer seemed to authenticate its horror status. It was claimed to be “the scariest movie of all time”. They made customers think that they needed to be scared (or maybe test their bravery?). It also contributed to the myths of ghosts and demons, which nowadays seems to be the only theme in horror films. Paranormal Activity was the beginning of many mockumentaries in the preceding years. Spoken out loud, the whole thing sounds ridiculous but I, unfortunately, fell for it for their clever advertisement strategy.

Monday, February 9, 2015

"The Rise of Popular Culture"



The article “The Rise of Popular Culture: A Historiographical Sketch,” by LeRoy Ashby, maps the constant change in popular culture and touches on the struggle for control of it. It has a lot of historical insight but the part that caught my attention was where James W. Cooks is quoted as saying, “Neither the producers nor the consumers of this culture maintained complete control”. David Suisman also examines this point by saying that although some popular songs may come from commercialization; a market doesn’t exist without the approval of consumers. Pop culture isn’t just dictated by ordinary people (or consumers) but also gets manipulated by businesses. Studying this topic made me realize that it is much more complex than I ever expected. It seemed easy at first; it was defined by the people. However, looking into it more, it suddenly matters who the people are. Popular culture goes through constant changes but we have to ask ourselves; where do these new ideas come from?